A more inclusive view of the
religious ‘other’
Abdullah Saeed
Islam commands a world following
of 1.2 billion people. 20 percent of the world’s
population. Islam comprises many schools of
thought, and this affects how Muslims view
people of other faiths.
Some Muslims are ‘inclusive’. To
have an inclusive faith means to be open to
people of other faiths, because all believers
are equal before God and therefore no particular
tradition ‘owns’ God. If we are
humble before God, that will put in context
any feelings of superiority we might have.
Exclusivism, on the other hand,
is lacking in openness and any sense of respect
for
others. This imbues adherents with a strong
sense of
superiority towards people of other faiths.
For Muslims, the Qu’ran
and the traditions of the Prophet are the basic
religious documents
and they contain many inclusive texts. Although
there are many movements today in favour
of a coming together with others, this is nothing
new in Muslim tradition. Sufis in particular
have a long tradition of inclusivism.
So what can we say about the
exclusivist propaganda and the violent outpourings
of,
say, Osama
Bin Laden? Only that this is merely one strand
in contemporary Islam: one that sadly we
hear too much of. In the multicultural societies
which exist today inclusivism has become
a
paramount need. Otherwise there can be no
peace.
First phase – origins
All humanity has come from a common origin. ‘Adam
and Eve’ are our common parents. But
although we have a common origin it is not
God’s will that every human should be
a carbon copy of every other. But to follow
God’s will is the common lot of all
communities. The commandment to live justly
is for all.
In the 7th Century Muhammad
believed that he was one of many prophets in
the line
of Moses,
Jesus and others. He taught that everyone
who follows God is a Muslim and that God
calls
all people to live a moral life.
|
The Qu’ran
teaches that God has sent out many prophets.
It acclaims Jesus as Messiah is the messenger
of Allah. The Gospels are recognised as coming
from God. However Muhammad only ‘included’ the
Abrahamic faiths.
Second
phase – exclusivism
In the course of time, however,
Islam moved into a more exclusivist outlook.
Islam
was now seen as superior. It taught the uniqueness
of God’s law and demanded universal
obedience. This exclusivism reflected what
was going on
in the world at large. The Muslim empire
had expanded across North Africa and penetrated
Spain. Its expansionism provoked hostility
and opposition from Christian Europe.
As a result of these conquests
Muslim minorities found themselves ruling over
a majority of others. Islam was becoming a
more formalised religion. This led to exclusivity.
It was asserted that Muslims must never be
ruled over by non-Muslims. They would be humiliated
and their faith would be restricted. They would
be contaminated by Christian ideas. Thus Islam
was beginning to seriously compete with Christianity.
The stage was being set for the Crusades.
Modern times
The modern era is the age of nation
states. In this context more freedom is allowed
even though common values are sought. People
move around more easily and the electronic
media enables there to be a much freer communication
of ideas. All this tends to challenge the exclusivist
tradition.
Islamic fundamentalism is much
in the news and this tends to mask the emergence
of other groups. For instance, the Progressive
Ijtihadis. These people are more influential
as philosophers than as purely religious teachers.
They are rationalists. They assert that change
must happen within Islam. The Qu’ran
must be updated. There needs to be stronger
emphasis on social justice. With movements
like this it is clear that inclusivism is back.
There is now an emphasis on what Muslims have
in common with ‘the other’, not
what is particular.
Where society is multicultural,
then religious pluralism becomes the norm.
People of different faiths co-operate to enhance
human dignity. Inevitably this leads to a more
peaceful way.
On 5 September, Professor
Abdullah Said, of the University of Melbourne,
gave the annual Peace Lecture at the University
of Otago |
The Golden Calf
Wendy Ward
How can ancient Biblical texts
inform our modern lives? The author Gerard
Hughes (God of Surprises, DLT 1999) suggests
that when we pray with Scripture, we imagine
God speaking to us personally and continuing
God’s story in us. I had reason to ponder
the ancient story of the making of the Golden
Calf recently (Exodus 32:1-35). Ironically,
it was both real calves and gold that caused
me to reflect on this story.
Newborn creatures cavorting
around their mothers are a familiar sign of
spring. However, dairy cow calves are removed
a few hours after their birth to be reared
in sheds or slaughtered as four-day-old ‘bobby
calves’. The demand for milk overrides
good animal husbandry practice.
So what about gold? The new
gold is white and flows out of a cow’s
udder. The production of milk is a great economic
success, benefiting the nation generally and
dairy farmers in particular. Fonterra is our
most successful global business.
It is not fanciful to suggest
that there is a new gold rush in New Zealand.
The land is again being plundered, not for
minerals but for grass. Approximately a hundred
farms in Southland will be going out of sheep
between January and May 2008. There is disquiet
about polluted waterways, rivers and lakes.
Prices of feed and fertilizer are rocketing
as dairy farms soak them up. Dairy farming
will soon be the province of the very wealthy,
as share milkers and young farmers struggle
to pay the millions required to buy a farm.
Then there are questions about the effects
of over-use of superphosphate on animals, people
and the land.
How can the original golden
calf story contribute to this debate? Here
is a brief summary of the story. |
The
Israelites, having escaped from Egypt, are
wandering in the desert wilderness. God, having
taken pity on the people, desires to show them
how to live in right relationship with God
and all creation. As their leader, Moses has
gone up a mountain to listen to God and return
with God’s Law. The people become impatient
and persuade the second-in-command, Aaron,
to build them an object to worship. Thus, the
Golden Calf is made from the melted down gold
of the people.
When this pagan idol is discovered,
Moses and God are furious. Moses intercedes
for the people, and God relents to an extent.
However, many of the unfaithful are killed
and later a plague comes upon them. The remainder
renew their allegiance to God and the relationship
is restored.
The Israelites, unable to wait
for Moses’ return, lowered their sights,
wanting gods made out of their gold. Good leadership
was essential for them and no less for us.
When there is a vacuum, people can turn to
wrong leaders. The Calf was a pagan idol that
had no value except to bewitch the people for
a short time. As we have seen, the idol cost
them far more than the gold trinkets used in
its making.
The white gold rush appears
to be good news for New Zealand, but it is
blinkered and hides issues that we don’t
want to acknowledge. Profit before good practice
never succeeds, as British farmers can confirm.
Here, in the King Country, we wonder why Landcorp
is selling all its farms around Lake Taupo.
Excessive use of fertilizer endangers both
the soil and animal welfare. The international
farming community has put pressure on Fonterra
regarding dairy cow welfare in New Zealand.
The story of the Golden Calf
leads us to ask, “Is current dairy farm
development and animal welfare practice in
right relationship with the life of this nation?” Or
are we so dazzled by dollars we cannot see
the new idol being fashioned under our noses? |
Antonio Rosmini (1797-1855)
On 18 November the Italian philosopher, patriot
and priest, Antonio Rosmini, will be beatified
by the church. The cynically minded might be
forgiven for saying “So what?”.
Just one more religious Founder honoured by
the church – no doubt paid for out of
the Order’s coffers! What did he really
do to deserve it? And why now? What is so special
about this obscure Italian who died 150 years
ago? The short answer is he achieved a lot
and has much to teach us today.
A lot of what? In my sitting room there is
the remains of a scholastic library. The bottom
shelf is taken up completely with Rosmini’s
writings. The national edition of his works,
in Italian, comprises more than 60 volumes.
One, on moral conscience, is over 400 pages.
His literary output was staggering.
Even if that sort of productivity hardly
qualifies a person to be a saint, there are
also some 10,000 letters – many to men
and women, priests, bishops and lay people
throughout Europe who approached him for spiritual
guidance. In his native Italy especially he
has long been celebrated for his spirituality
and personal holiness.
Who was Rosmini?
Well, clearly, he was a very bright
character. It is said he was found at the age
of 12 poring over the writings of St Thomas
Aquinas. He probably got his ears boxed for
being so precocious, but it didn’t put
him off. At the age of 21 while at University
he spent the equivalent of $40,000 buying a
monastic library! Today’s students appear
to spend a fortune on beer. Rosmini spent it
on books!
The Europe Rosmini was born into was a world
dominated by the so-called Enlightenment, which
secularised European philosophical thinking.
Rosmini from his early 20s resolved to devote
his life to putting God back again at the centre
of human thinking. For instance, in an early
published work, the New Essay on the Origin
of Ideas (1830), Rosmini asserts that although
we acquire all particular ideas via the senses,
the idea of being itself is innate. It is God
who infuses the human mind with this primal
idea, which is the light of reason. Indeed,
we can infer the reality of God from the very
fact that we are rational beings. The ‘light
of reason’ has to come from somewhere.
Likewise, in his moral writings Rosmini is
insistent that at the heart of moral conscience
is the voice of God. Human behaviour must be
founded on the law of God, writ large on the
human heart. |
Even as a young
adult Rosmini sought to surround himself with
like-minded people who would devote themselves
to the reform of human society. At the very
time that the Utilitarians in England were
placing self-interest as the mainspring of
human society, Rosmini and his friends were
asserting that nothing less than universal
charity and the love of God must lie at the
heart of every human endeavour.
The Rosminian question
Rosmini’s ideas were much admired,
but they also aroused fierce and prolonged
opposition in Italy. It is difficult for us
in the Anglo-Saxon world to comprehend the
malice of what is often called odium theologicum,
the vicious attacks and calumnies heaped upon
someone who dares to offer original and sometimes
revolutionary ideas. In particular, a campaign
of denigration led to Rosmini’s books
being examined by Rome. Two of his political
works were placed on the Index of prohibited
books (and stayed there until the 1950s!).
Eventually, Pope Pius IX ordered a comprehensive
examination of his religious works, which in
1854 completely exonerated Rosmini from any
formal error. Unfortunately, out of deference
to Rosmini’s opponents, the Pope refrained
from publishing this Decree .
Perhaps nothing better underlines the true
humility of this remarkable man than the way
he submitted to these injustices. His only
concern was that the works of the two Congregations
he had founded might suffer – which they
did. Now at last, the church has repudiated
this condemnation (see TM July 2004) thus vindicating
Rosmini and clearing the way for his beatification.
His relevance today
There are thousands of saints, mostly
unsung. So why canonise this or that particular
person? In a recent book Why the Catholic Church
Makes Saints, the authors noted that often
the church canonises people who speak to a
particular age – ‘horses for courses’!
Nothing is more characteristic of our modern
age than to divorce faith from life, to consign
God to the attic. Yet for Rosmini, to leave
God out of philosophy, ethics or any branch
of human knowledge is to destroy the whole
basis of human life. He consistently taught
the centrality of God. And by placing charity
as the central plank of his spirituality, he
lived what he taught.
Rosmini has plenty to say to today’s
world.
– Michael Hill |